A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
✓Claimant Jaime Sierra Sanchez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma por cuanto demandante no corrigió en los términos indicados en el auto inadmisorio
- Carencia de especificidad y pertinencia de cargos
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia.
El rechazo se dio porque el actor no consiguió superar los defectos relativos a la falta de pertinencia y especificidad en la formulación del cargo propuesto.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación considera que persisten los fundamentos hipotéticos del accionante y por eso decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE
- CONFIRMAR el auto del 13 de octubre de 2017, dictado por el Magistrado Sustanciador Alejandro Linares Cantillo, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda, identificada con el numero de radicacion D-12317.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.